Uncategorized

Internet poetry – an oxymoron?


I’ve been dismayed to read a recent discussion by poets who feel they don’t want their work in a forthcoming anthology to be promoted as “Internet-related.” This is, they say, because they fear damage to their literary reputations from being associated as “Internet poets.” As though it carries an actual taint, rather than just being a new form of publishing.

Well, I never. And this discussion — not to mention the whole anthology coordinating project — was carried out online. By a virtual poetry community, a group that wanted to publish a representative anthology. Yet some don’t want to be identified with the Internet that brought them together.

The argument against being identified as an Internet poet is that there are no standards that can be enforced in a virtual literary community. You can’t uphold literary standards such as exist in the print world. The print world, where you can self-publish a book that looks just like any other published, glossy-covered book, and mass-produce magazines on your own computer.

And that’s the problem they have, these I-phobic poets, that it’s a form of self-publishing, this anthology collective. Maybe they should have thought about the nature of an Internet collective before they signed on to be part of it.

Old prejudices die hard. It’s absurd to think that you can’t write a good poem if you aren’t a professor, but that’s where some have taken the “literary standards” they are upholding.

This elitest stance and knee-jerk stigma hardly supports the spirit of art — discovery. I’m sure the same kind of thing greeted the first mass-produced book — “Look, it’s not a papyrus. What junk! Where’s the scrolling, the spindles?”

And the same will be said of the first truly downloadable (in some manageable, readable form), full-length book. Internet-related sea-changes have arrived in journalism and are coming in publishing, where in book sales “flat is the new up.” I predict that people won’t stop buying conventionally bound book, but will find new ways to locate what they wish to read.

Well, would you like to continue to shuffle the pages of your thinning newspaper in the hope of find a single poetry book reveiw every month or so? Or would you rather bring your coffee cup into the family room and log onto Smartish Pace, where the number of interesting in-depth book reviews is sure to stretch your poetry-purchasing budget?

Let’s don’t be stupid about this. The future is here, thanks to the Internet. And it’s artist-friendly.

For good online book reviews, try: Rain Taxi, The Elegant Variation, Books Inq. (with a great blogroll of reviewing blogs), Arts & Letters Daily.

Visit https://racheldacus.net for more information and writing by Rachel Dacus.

Share and Enjoy !

Shares

5 thoughts on “Internet poetry – an oxymoron?”

  1. 情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,A片,A片,情色,A片,A片,情色,A片,A片,情趣用品,A片,情趣用品,A片,情趣用品,a片,情趣用品A片,A片,AV女優,色情,成人,做愛,情色,AIO,視訊聊天室,SEX,聊天室,自拍,AV,情色,成人,情色,aio,sex,成人,情色免費A片,美女視訊,情色交友,免費AV,色情網站,辣妹視訊,美女交友,色情影片,成人影片,成人網站,H漫,18成人,成人圖片,成人漫畫,情色網,日本A片,免費A片下載,性愛情色文學,色情A片,A片下載,色情遊戲,色情影片,色情聊天室,情色電影,免費視訊,免費視訊聊天,免費視訊聊天室,一葉情貼圖片區,情色視訊,免費成人影片,視訊交友,視訊聊天,言情小說,愛情小說,AV片,A漫,AVDVD,情色論壇,視訊美女,AV成人網,成人交友,成人電影,成人貼圖,成人小說,成人文章,成人圖片區,成人遊戲,愛情公寓,情色貼圖,色情小說,情色小說,成人論壇av女優,av,av片,aio交友愛情館,ut聊天室,聊天室,豆豆聊天室,色情聊天室,尋夢園聊天室,080聊天室,視訊聊天室,080苗栗人聊天室,上班族聊天室,成人聊天室,中部人聊天室,一夜情聊天室,情色聊天室,情色視訊A片,A片,A片下載,做愛,成人電影,.18成人,日本A片,情色小說,情色電影,成人影城,自拍,情色論壇,成人論壇,情色貼圖,情色,免費A片,成人,成人網站,成人圖片,AV女優,成人光碟,色情,色情影片,免費A片下載,SEX,AV,色情網站,本土自拍,性愛,成人影片,情色文學,成人文章,成人圖片區,成人貼圖

  2. Let them be. They have their standards and the Internet doesn’t measure up, yet.

    It’s too bad. Personally, I feel sorry for them. They’re caught in a paradigm shift and they’re only trying to keep from becoming contaminated by the loose and disheveled. Purity is important to them and the internet is too low for such high minds. It’s too undisciplined, too raw, rude and uneducated. And if they don’t maintain their quo, the art form will suffer, you know. If they’re seen as lowly Internet Poets, they’ll be tarred forever. Imagine, being seen on the same stage with the ‘not really’ published and the ‘too easily published’. That’s sure to destroy the REAL poet’s livelihood .. oh wait ..

    People who take themselves that seriously need to be laughed more often, you know.

    More worried with their rank than with the words.
    Now here’s an anthology ya can skip.

    -blue

  3. Hi Rachel –
    The internet flap surprised me too. I wondered why anyone with those feelings would want to be involved in an internet community! Also I have read a lot of just so-so poems in reputable print journals. As a matter of fact, the array of fairly well-known poets who appear in online journals is striking.

    Joyce Nower

  4. Rachel –

    Very interesting post. I read part of the discussion you are referring to, and am intrigued by these same thoughts — these folks participate online, the anthology came to BE online, so what’s the deal? Although I must admit that even all these years after I began to interact with poets and poetry online, I haven’t fully given up my own bias toward print journals. But I’m coming along, albeit slowly!

    – Kelly in Nebraska

Comments are closed.